• @threeduck@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    176 months ago

    But why wouldn’t a rival company just start up and sell the cures? Not all pharma companies sell insulin.

    • @matcha_addict@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      The bar to entry in the pharma market is extremely high. You need a lot of capital to enter it, which quickly disqualifies 95% of the population.

      Now of course, people without money can still get funding from investors. But those investors are already racking big profits from the continuous model of insulin treatments. A cure would be a detriment to their profits, so it’s not something they’re interested in funding. Not all pharma is insulin, but it’s one of the bigger pharma industries.

      This isn’t to mention that if you were one of the 5% and managed to have the resources to find and produce a cure, that the other mega corporations (with more funds than most of those 5% individuals) wouldn’t engage in anti competitive practices to shut you down. Many companies had good products but still ultimately failed.

      Unfortunately capitalism does not allow innovation to flourish like many of us were taught to believe.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
      link
      fedilink
      -76 months ago

      Because then the rival company would also go out of business. The pharma industry is not about absolute cure but about continuously selling things - like all industries do. Medicine that cures you entirely and is not needed afterwards forever again is nothing the pharma industry wants.

      • AbsentBird
        link
        fedilink
        276 months ago

        Exactly, that’s why we’ll never have a vaccine for something like polio, it’s too profitable to make and sell iron lungs.

        • @BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You joke, but that’s actually a really interesting story. Jonas Salk, the developer of the first polio vaccine was adamantly against even patenting it and claimed that it ‘belonged to the people’. There is some potential controversy there, but we mostly just think he was a pretty great dude. Dude’s a fucking hero regardless.

          I get the analogy you’re trying to make, but maybe want to switch to something else.

          • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            I get the analogy you’re trying to make, but maybe want to switch to something else.

            Like any other vaccine?

          • AbsentBird
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I don’t really see how that goes against it. If anything it shows that some people will totally disregard profit in favor of bettering humanity. See also: the patent for insulin.